THE medical conspiracy SHOW

(Added: June 04, 2011)

The Foxes are still guarding the Henhouse.

This page shows proof of just how far the criminal medical establishment in this country is willing to go to maintain its stranglehold on people's lives and their freedom in health care; and to squash out of existence any perceived threat to their beastly monopoly.

Last month we reported a court order (Filing #131) signed by Judge James M. Moody, stating that although Lase Med Inc. had stated that they would provide the court with depositions of defense witnesses, that in fact no such depositions nor testimony EXIST.

It appears that their story has now changed somewhat, for whatever reason. Below are scans of the most recent motion filed by attorney and political toadie Will Bond, concerning the bogus Westphal v Lase Med Inc lawsuit.

Lase Med Inc. was never informed at any point during this case, that the only acceptable form of witness testimony to this court would be that of an oncologist, who would only speak out in defense of the money-and-eugenics-driven oncology industry, but it now appears that indeed this is the only type of testimony that isn't considered irrelevant or invalid to this court.

In this recent "motion for exclusion of testimony," each one of Lase Med's defense witnesses is systematically invalidated and disqualified, (after the harrowing process months ago of finding witnesses that the court would indeed accept and depose; some disqualified for not being Arkansas residents, when the plaintiff was herself from California!), on grounds that would almost be insanely comical... if not so tragic. In each case, the witness testimony is accused of being "more prejudicial than probative;" meaning by their definition, that it could "mislead a court or jury."

How? By exposing them to inconvenient truths?

In each case, the witness testimony is cited as "irrelevant," because in the words of the plaintiff's attorney, the witnesses did not have "extensive medical knowledge" of the laser treatment, and of cancer; that includes the M.D. witness as well. Did the court not know in advance that these were PATIENTS, AND NOT ONCOLOGISTS WHO MAKE THEIR LIVING FROM THE SAME VESTED INTERESTS THAT ARE TRYING TO DESTROY LASE MED? And what would they consider probative testimony? Anything that supports the eugenics-driven oncology industry obviously.

This is not justice.
This is not even a court case.
This is nothing but a one-sided tribunal.
What was the point of even having an opposing side, when any position contrary to mainstream oncology's "standard" position is disqualified?

• Since when does a witness, sworn in to testify, have to provide independent proof of his or her statements?

• Since when does a witness have to be an expert on the technical side of the subject involved in his or her deposition?

• Since when does a witness, testifying under oath about his or her own experience with a defendant, have to match the exact location and/ or circumstances of the plaintiff?

• As far as we know, witnesses are called in to explain their view of what happened and/ or how they were affected by dealing with a defendant.